GENERAL PROBLEM SOLVING OF NEW PHYSICS / SURe:
THE REALITY OF ALL EVENTS AND STATES ARE DESCRIBED AND EXPLAINED IN NEW PHYSICS BY THE UNIQUE UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES.
AS THESE PRINCIPLES HAVE NOT BEEN DERIVED BEFORE, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE IN CURRENT PHYSICS TO FIND REAL EXPLANATIONS FOR ABOUT 90% OF PHYSICAL OBSERVATIONS. THUS IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND PHYSICS. SO THERE ARE MANY MORE PROBLEMS THAN LISTED HERE:
BY UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES EVERY WHY- QUESTION CAN BE ANSWERED. THE ANSWERS OF NEW PHYSICS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR REALITY, WHICH ARE: PHYSICAL, CONCRETE, DESCRIPTIVE, LOGICAL, CLEAR, UNAMBIGUOUS, CONSISTENT, IRREFUTABLE.
The fundamental problem in physics is that the universal laws of physics have not been defined. By this it was not possible to explain the universe by reality.
The fundamental knowledge of physics is the concrete description of matter, which includes the physical shape (structure) of all particles. This is not available. Exclusively by the structure all characteristics and interactions can be described and explained. Thus it makes no sense to work out theories about interactions of particles without knowing the detailed structure.
Till now all interactions and states in universe could not be explained by reality and thus could not be understood. Only some natural and experimental descriptions are reality, but in most cases also the descriptions of observations are no reality, because these were biased by interpretations.
Overall all current statements concerning matter, forces and energies are far away from physical reality and have never been observed.
The Scientific Universal Reality of matter including the reality of structure of atoms are explained under Greatest Errors on www.new-physics.org..
Currently this chapter is revised.
It has to be emphasized that every scientist can describe and explain all interactions in universe conform to reality by just knowing the two Universal Laws of nature (=Weltformel).
The specific problems according to Wikipedia are:
island of stability" in the proton vs. neutron number plot for heavy nuclei
Quantum chromodynamics: What are the phases of strongly interacting matter, and what roles do they play in the evolution of cosmos? What is the detailed partonic structure of the nucleons? What does QCD predict for the properties of strongly interacting matter? What determines the key features of QCD, and what is their relation to the nature of gravity and spacetime? Do glueballs exist? Do gluons acquire mass dynamically despite having a zero rest mass, within hadrons? Does QCD truly lack CP-violations? Do gluons saturate when their occupation number is large? Do gluons form a dense system called Colour Glass Condensate? What are the signatures and evidences for the Balitsky-Fadin-Kuarev-Lipatov, Balitsky-Kovchegov, Catani-Ciafaloni-Fiorani-Marchesini evolution equations?
Nuclei and nuclear astrophysics: Why is there a lack of convergence in estimates of the mean lifetime of a free neutron based on two separate- and increasingly precise- experimental methods? What is the nature of the nuclear force that binds protons and neutrons into stable nuclei and rare isotopes? What is the nature of exotic excitations in nuclei at the frontiers of stability and their role in stellar processes? What is the nature of neutron stars and dense nuclear matter? What is the origin of the elements in the cosmos? What are the nuclear reactions that drive stars and stellar explosions? What is the heaviest possible chemical element?
Some specific explanation by SURe New Physics:
DECAY OF NEUTRON
Spontaneous decays are physically impossible. All radioactive decays are activated by cosmic photons (mostly from sun) with specific kinetic energy. Therefore the lifetimes of free neutrons depend on sun activity and distance to sun.
MATTER OF NEUTRON STARS
In center of stars hydrogen is fused to a proton complex. Neutron stars are the remnants of supernovae and consists of a mixture of proton complex and hydrogen. All elements besides hydrogen are generated by supernovae (= nuclear fission of large proton complex to smaller proton complexes, which are atomic nuclei). While kinetic energy remains constant, the velocity of satellites is not only determined by distance to celestial bodies but also by concentration of omnipresent photons.The differences of concentration of neutrinos is not taken into account to calculate the predicted energy. Most artificially generated heavy elements are transition states and thus no particles according to New Physics.
Abraham-Minkowski controversy: What is the momentum of light in optical media? Whether Abraham's or Minkowski's momentum is right?
First scientific explanation of MOMENTUM OF LIGHT by SURe New Physics:
Light particles are photons. Momentum is the force by kinetic energy. The correct formula for kinetic energy for any particle or body is Ekin = mass multiplied by relative velocity. The velocity of photons is much higher than the propagation speed of photons. The propagation speed is strongly reduced by penetration of omnipresent photons and other particles.
The propagation speed of photons are mostly reduced in optical media, the kinetic energy remains stable in optical media.
The kinetic energy of photons correlates to “frequency” which has a wrong meaning. The normalization factor is called Planck constant, which is no natural constant.
Inertial mass of a photon is similar to that of a pion.
Bose-Einstein condensates by New Physics:
All particles condense, which means bind each other at a specific low temperature, which is always done identical by overlapping of spin energies. All statements concerning Bose-Einstein effects do not make sense, as these have nothing in common with reality.
Singular trajectories in the Newtonian N-body problem: Does the set of initial conditions for which particles that undergo near-collisions gain infinite speed in finite time have measure zero? This is known to be the case when N ≤ 4, but the question remains open for larger N.
First scientific explanation of INFLUENCES OF BODIES by SURe New Physics:
Currently there is a complete wrong understanding of forces and interactions. For example there are no attractive or repulsive forces between particles or bodies. Motions can only be unfluenced by collisions. Mostly these are collisions by omnipresent photons. This influene is called gravitation. Currently no interactions with omnipresent photons are taken into account. For celestial bodies it is nearly never the case that there are mutual forces. because these are not stable. So there is always that he bigger celestial body impacts the smaller celestial body, which is done indirectly by a concentration gradient oh Ops. For particles it also can be neglected that 3 particles collide at exactly the same time. avitational forces are impacting impacting only the New Physics can explain all motions and interactions. by universal principles.