Solved by New Physics:                     List of  Problems in Physics

New Physics/ SURe eliminates all mysteries,  inconsistencies and open questions of Physics.

Unsolved Problems of Astrophysics

and the Solutions by New Physics/ SURe

In this chapter first the copied problem (from Wikipedia) is listed

followed by the solution of New Physics/ SURe.  


Astronomy and astrophysics


 Astrophysical jet by New Physics:

It is impossible that strongly focused particle beams can be generated in cosmos. All shown pictures of jets are no jets as postulated. New physics explains observations of "jets" by

  • Galaxies which have some sister galaxies in a row, where between sister galaxies gravitational fields are formed where matter has been accumulated
  • A celestial body has traveled through space of galaxy with high concentration of hydrogen. By this it functioned as condensation nuclei for molecular clouds.  
Accretion discs by New Physics:

Accretion discs have been postulated to explain energy generation (radiation) of neutron stars and black holes  and to explain  mass increase of white dwarfs. New Physics has found out that neutron stars and Neutrino stars (black holes) generate radiation /energy by reactions without need of accreted matter. Supernovae cannot be initiated by mass increase but exclusively by specific  reactions which are identical for all supernovae. So the irrealistic accretion discs, which have never been observed  are not needed to explain anything and can be eliminated. Around neutrino stars there are spheric bulges but no disclike structures as neutrino stars release neutrinos to all directions. In increasing distancies beyond bulge disclike structures are preferred because gravitational fields prefer to be formed in two or one dimension when density of neutrinos is low. But that does not lead to an increased rate of celestial bodies or matter which "falls" to the center. . 

Pulsation of radiation by New Physics:

Pulsation of radiation including mass dependency is scientifically explained by New Physics. Origin of pulsation is the fact that more or less large bubbles of magnetic fields are generated by reactions in center of celestial bodies which burst out of the surface. Magnetic fields are bound structures, which can have different sizes. Small structures are released from stars as small bubbles observed by grain structure on sun surface (high frequency of pulsation) .  Large structures are released as huge bubbles observed as flares on sun surface (low frequency of pulsation). Pulsation is no effect of self Rotation of stars!




  • Diffuse interstellar bands: What is responsible for the numerous interstellar absorption lines detected in astronomical spectra? Are they molecular in origin, and if so which molecules are responsible for them? How do they form?

Diffuse interstellar bands by New Physics:

These are mainly generated by interstellar magnetic fields. Magnetic fields can get extreme huge and have different strength of stability depending on structure  (chain structures or rod structures). In addition bound end particles of the magnetic chain structures like protons and electrons play a role concerning spectroscopic observations. 



  • Supermassive black holes: What is the origin of the M-sigma relation between supermassive black hole mass and galaxy velocity dispersion?[39] How did the most distant quasars grow their supermassive black holes up to 1010 solar masses so early in the history of the universe?

Supermassive black holes  by New Physics:

Whereas stellar black holes are generated out of neutron stars by reaction of neutronium to neutrinium with strong energy generation (=quasar) a supermassive black hole is generated by freezing of omnipresent neutrinos to neutrinium ( =frozen neutrinos). The term "black hole" for a star is rather unscientific and should be eliminated. New Physics uses the term "neutrino star". 

M-Sigma relation by New Physics:

The mass of black holes determines the maximal orbital velocity of stars. At bnner bulge the orbital velocities starts always near zero. Thus the velocity dispersion correlates to mass.

  • Kuiper cliff: Why does the number of objects in the Solar System's Kuiper belt fall off rapidly and unexpectedly beyond a radius of 50 astronomical units?
Kuiper cliff by New Physics:
It is a typical observation, that specific matter condenses at a specific distance to star, which probably is a tmperature effect .
Flyby anomaly by New Physics:
While kinetic energy remains constant, the velocity of satellites  is not only determined by distance to celestial bodies but also by concentration of omnipresent neutrinos.The differences of concentration of neutrinos is not taken into account  to calculate the predicted energy.     
  • Galaxy rotation problem: Is dark matter responsible for differences in observed and theoretical speed of stars revolving around the centre of galaxies, or is it something else?


Rotation curve of a typical spiral galaxy: predicted (A) and observed (B). Can the discrepancy between the curves be attributed to dark matter?


Galaxy rotation problem by New Physics:
This is due to a wrong understanding of gravitation and a wrong understanding of black holes (=neutrino stars). Both issues are explained by New Physics: Link
  • Supernovae: What is the exact mechanism by which an implosion of a dying star becomes an explosion?

Supernovae by New Physics:

There is no implosion and no "dying star". A supernova  is a strong  reaction of matter at surface of stars, which is initiated by sudden pressure drop by release of pressure (magnetic fields). A supernova is a self-accelerated reaction at the beginning and then the reaction is controlled by the surface area of the star. The reacting matter is a mixture of neutronium and atomic matter. The neutronium of the mixture reacts to atomic matter by nuclear fission. By this all known atoms and simple molecules are generated and emitted in space. The reaction stops when layers in the central region of the star are reached, which consists of high percentage of neutronium and some percentage of neutrinium, which stabilizes the neutronium. This is the explanation that there remains  a neutron star as remnant of supernovae of ordinary stars.Supernovar of white dwarfs have no remnant, as they are too small (too low pressure) to generate neutrinium.   

p-nuclei by New Physics:
Proton rich nuclei are generated by nuclear fission of neutronium(=supernova) like all other nuclei.
Hydrogen has been generated within few days after generation of the universe. All reactions in early universe occured by low temperatures. Hot temperatures would not have allowed any generation of matter  as bonding reactions require cold temperatures.  The cold temperatures caused that hydrogen first condensed to hydrogen clouds and then crystallized to hydrogen stars. Crystallization or freezing of hydrogen is well known by physicists by experimental observations. Freezing occurs by mutual bondings of the protons of hydrogen, and thus is a nuclear fusion reaction. By the pressure in center of stars hydrogen reacts further by nuclear fusion to neutronium. Before nuclear fusion of protons the electromagnetic fields (chains of neutrinos), which bind atomic electrons to atomic nuclei, are released and travel to the surface of star.Partly thes decay to IR-radiation (= IR-neutrinos or heat). Only very  little helium is generated in stars. All other atoms and most helium is generated by supernovae (nuclear fission of neutronium).
Ultra-high-Energy cosmic ray by New Physics:
UHECR is postulated, as physicists can't explain the extreme high amounts of energy they transfer to the atmosphere of earth in form of billions of  subatomic particles (called air showers). But this is a biased observation: The total observed energy is not transferred but generated by a relative normal gamma-ray. The energy of a gamma-ray-neutrino is sufficient to initiate air showers in atmosphere. The generation of air showers is one of many biased observations that caused that physicists did not realize how "clean energy" can be generated out of every form of ordinary matter. The energy is generated by collisions of gamma-rays to protons (nuclei) of atmosphere, by which a decay of the proton is activated. 
All decay reactions convert non-usable bonding energy to usable kinetic energy. The decay  products of protons have so much energy  that these can cause further proton decays and so on. This explains the form and the huge energy of air showers. It is not an issue of energy of the first collision; it is just an issue of statistics how many collisions against protons occur. The activation can be done by much lower energy. The potency of energy generation can get up to billions. 
  • Rotation rate of Saturn: Why does the magnetosphere of Saturn exhibit a (slowly changing) periodicity close to that at which the planet's clouds rotate? What is the true rotation rate of Saturn's deep interior?[40]

Magnetosphere of Saturn by New Physics

Magnetic fields of celestial bodies are simply generated by self-rotation. Magnetic fields are generated by movements (collisions) of  free electrons versus omnipresent neutrinos. Omnipresent neutrinos (formerly aether) are dragged by gravitation.
As gravitation does not drag matter by self rotation, omnipresent neutrinos do not follow rotation of celestial bodies,
which is contrary to atmosphere.
If there is matter with free electrons in clouds of Saturn, these generate magnetic fields depending on movement of


Origin of Magnetars by New Physics
 It is impossible to determine the strength of magnetic fields without a probe in the magnetic field . The postulate of neutron stars with extreme strong magnetic fields (=magnetars) is extreme unreliable. It has been a conclusion from an event of high energetic radiation. But an event which bursts out gamma rays does not give any Information about strength of magnetic fields. Even flares of magnetic fields of sun do not show the strength of the magnetic field of sun. The contrary is the case: Ultra strong magnetic fields would absorb radiation of stars. The term magnetars should be eliminated as it is not based on science but it is an invented term in order  to arouse public interest for astrophysics.    
  • Large-scale anisotropy: Is the universe at very large scales anisotropic, making the cosmological principle an invalid assumption? The number count and intensity dipole anisotropy in radio, NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) catalogue[41] is inconsistent with the local motion as derived from cosmic microwave background[42][43] and indicate an intrinsic dipole anisotropy. The same NVSS radio data also shows an intrinsic dipole in polarization density and degree of polarization[44] in the same direction as in number count and intensity. There are several other observation revealing large-scale anisotropy. The optical polarization from quasars shows polarization alignment over a very large scale of Gpc.[45][46][47] The cosmic-microwave-background data shows several features of anisotropy,[48][49][50][51] which are not consistent with the Big Bang model.
Large-scale anisotropy by New Physics
A better name for this is "axis of evil" because it reveals lots of irrealistic hypotheses of physics like big bang theory. The anisotropy is just the effect of the "wind of aether", which means the movement through omnipresent neutrinos. CMB measurement is equivalent to measurement of the kinetic energy of omnipresent neutrinos. Kinetic energy is a relative energy, which is verified by Doppler effect.  The observations of anisotropy are not inconsistent to the cosmological principle, which is strictly valid. As omnipresent neutrinos are dragged by earth without rotation, the anisotropy measured on earth is different from anisotropy measured by satellites. 
  • Space roar: Why is space roar six times louder than expected? What is the source of space roar?
Space roar by New Physics
Space roar is measured by radiometers. Radiometers measure all types of radiation and therefore can't give information about the energy of the radiation. There is information about the intensities (concentration)  of radiation. As the sensors were cooled down to 2.7K there is a high concentration of low energetic radiation like omnipresent neutrinos which count as signal.  So the high intensities are rxplainable, but provide no relevant  information. It is much more useful to get information about cosmos by specific spectroscopic measurements.
  • Age–metallicity relation in the Galactic disk: Is there a universal age–metallicity relation (AMR) in the Galactic disk (both "thin" and "thick" parts of the disk)? Although in the local (primarily thin) disk of the Milky Way there is no evidence of a strong AMR,[52] a sample of 229 nearby "thick" disk stars has been used to investigate the existence of an age–metallicity relation in the Galactic thick disk, and indicate that there is an age–metallicity relation present in the thick disk.[53][54] Stellar ages from asteroseismology confirm the lack of any strong age-metallicity relation in the Galactic disc.[55]

Age-metallic relation by New Physics

It has alreay been mentioned that hydrogen was generated very early in universe and that all other atoms needed

evolution of stars until supernova. 

Lithium Problem by New Physics
As theories of big bang and nucleosynthesis are no reality the predicted amount of Li-7  can't be accurate.
Ultraluminous pulsar by New Physics:
There are just three possibilitis in cosmos to  generate extreme high amounts of radiation:
* Supermovae
* Collisions of all kind of  celestial bodies
* High densities of stars which are present in bulge of galaxies
Radiation in all 3 cases can have a broad range of energies including more or less amounts of X-rays. 
High frequency of collisions of stars to supermassive neutrino stars (galactical center) can lead to an irregular pulsation with strong intensities, The eddington Limit has no scientific basis and does not exist. For comparisons of  luminescence/ intensities of radiation it is important to use same maesurement equipment.  
  • Fast radio bursts: Transient radio pulses lasting only a few milliseconds, from emission regions thought to be no larger than a few hundred kilometres, and estimated to occur several hundred times a day. While several theories have been proposed, there is no generally accepted explanation for them. The only known repeating FRB emanates from a galaxy roughly 3 billion light years from Earth.[58][59]

Fast Radio Bursts by New Physics

Same Explanation as above. 




Solutions by New Physics/ SURe: